Bessent faults Lutnick’s Commerce Department over Megaspeed entity-list delay
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC that several agencies had favoured placing Megaspeed on the US entity list for months, according to a BBC report that casts the delay as a Commerce Department failure.

In this piece
Scott Bessent said on CNBC that several government agencies had supported putting Megaspeed on the US entity list for months, the BBC reported. The account…
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has faulted the Commerce Department under Howard Lutnick for failing to block Megaspeed, according to a BBC Technology report on his remarks to CNBC.
Bessent said several government agencies “were in favour of putting Megaspeed on the entity list for months.” The BBC account presents that comment as criticism of Commerce for not acting on a restriction that other parts of the government had already backed.
The entity list is a US export-control tool administered by the Commerce Department. Placement on it restricts a named party’s access to certain US goods and technology, subject to licensing rules. The BBC report does not describe the specific goods, licences, or transactions at issue in the Megaspeed case.
Bessent’s remarks, as reported, point to an interagency dispute rather than a single-agency decision made in isolation. He indicated that support for listing Megaspeed had existed across several agencies for months, while the step he described had not been taken.
The BBC headline identifies Lutnick’s Commerce Department as the office Bessent holds responsible. The published account does not include a response from Lutnick, the Commerce Department, or Megaspeed, and it does not quote any further exchange from the CNBC interview.
Export-control listings often sit at the junction of commercial, security, and diplomatic interests. A delay that one official describes as a failure to act can, in other circumstances, reflect unresolved legal, evidentiary, or foreign-policy questions. The BBC report does not say which, if any, of those factors applied here.
What the source does establish is the political framing: a Cabinet official publicly stating that peer agencies had favoured a listing for months, and a news account tying the lack of action to Commerce. It does not establish when the internal discussions began, which agencies took which positions, or whether a formal recommendation was ever sent.
Megaspeed is named in the report only as the party under discussion for the entity list. The article as provided does not describe the company’s ownership, location, products, or any alleged conduct. Those details are not supplied here.
The comments matter because entity-list decisions are among the more visible tools the United States uses to limit access to sensitive technology. A public split between the Treasury secretary and the Commerce Department, if it stands, signals disagreement inside the administration over pace and responsibility.
The BBC item does not report any new listing, any reversal of an existing control, or any deadline Bessent set for Commerce. It also does not say whether the CNBC interview included documents or only the secretary’s characterisation of internal views.
What happens next is not set out in the report. Any listing would still be a Commerce Department action, and the account leaves open whether the months of support Bessent described will produce a formal designation or remain an unresolved internal argument.
Until Commerce, the other agencies, or Megaspeed address the claim on the record, the public record rests on Bessent’s CNBC statement as relayed by the BBC: several agencies favoured putting Megaspeed on the entity list for months, and he blames Lutnick’s department for the failure to block it.
Primary source: BBC Technology. Newzly rewrites and structures source reporting for clarity; verify critical details at the original.